4.7 Article

Optimizing direct laser metal deposition of H13 cladding on CuBe alloy substrate

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 432, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128084

关键词

Direct laser metal deposition; Copper-beryllium alloy; H13; Substrate preheating, load-bearing capability; Wear resistance

资金

  1. Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR) through the Departments of Excellence program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aims to deposit single-layer H13 tool steel cladding on a CuBe alloy substrate using DLMD. By optimizing the process parameters and substrate preheating temperature, a high-quality and dense cladding layer was successfully obtained.
This work aims at depositing single-layer H13 tool steel cladding on a precipitation hardening copper-beryllium (CuBe) alloy substrate using direct laser metal deposition (DLMD). The process parameters, i.e. laser power, powder feed rate, overlap ratio, and substrate temperature were optimized at the scan speed of 1000 mm/min for both single-track and single-layer cladding. The clad quality was evaluated according to i) geometrical features ii) cladding defects, iii) interfacial adhesion, and iv) substrate over-aging. The energy-mass balance was sensitive to the variation of processing parameters especially when the high-reflectivity CuBe substrate was used. The dense and sound cladding was eventually deposited after parameter optimization. Substrate preheating inhibited crack formation. However, the higher the preheating temperature, the larger the substrate softening due to over-aging: using 150 degrees C, the substrate hardness decreased by 13% down to 2.7 mm in depth, while at 250 degrees C it decreased by 40% down to the same depth. The single-layer H13 clad layer produced at a 150 degrees C-preheating temperature showed a better load-bearing capability than CuBe alloy substrate, up to 20 kN indentation load. Meanwhile, its surface hardness and wear resistance were remarkably higher.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据