4.7 Article

Using optical interference filters to measure autofluorescence in substrates and coatings

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127777

关键词

Autofluorescence; Fluorescence detection; Optical interference filters; Optical materials; Coatings; Picowatt sensitivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In fluorescence microscopy, autofluorescence from optical elements in the system can limit background levels. Although weaker than fluorescence from organic dyes, detailed spectral information about autofluorescence comes at the cost of sensitivity. The study presents an approach using a chopped laser and phase-lock detection scheme for sensitive fluorescence measurements, controlling the trade-off between spectral information and sensitivity through filter edge locations and bandwidths.
In fluorescence microscopy and related applications, fluorescence from optical elements in the system can be a limiting factor in achieving low background levels. Such autofluorescence is considerably weaker than the fluorescence produced by the organic dyes used in fluorescence-based analytical techniques. While spectrally detailed information about autofluorescence is desirable, such information comes at a cost of sensitivity. We present a straightforward approach to making sensitive fluorescence measurements using a simple chopped laser and phase-lock detection scheme. By using high-quality optical filters in the excitation and detection paths, the trade-off between spectral information and ultimate sensitivity is controlled by the choice of filter edge locations and bandwidths. An initial implementation of this approach, using a 405 nm diode laser as an excitation source, achieves a sensitivity of -1 pW optical power of detected fluorescence over a bandwidth of similar to 125 nm centered at 505 nm. Data from measurements on glass substrates are presented, and challenges for evaluating autofluorescence from coatings on glass are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据