4.7 Article

IceBreaker: Software for high-resolution single-particle cryo-EM with non-uniform ice

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 522-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.01.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of York and Diamond [Light Source Ltd] joint studentship
  2. UK Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [206422/Z/17/Z]
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/S003339/1]
  4. European Research Council [101021133]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/V000403/1]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [101021133] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the abundance of software tools, optimal particle selection remains a crucial issue in cryo-EM. IceBreaker is introduced as a valuable tool that estimates and equalizes the relative ice gradient, allowing differentiation of particles and improving selection performance. The software also introduces a parameter for local ice thickness, enabling particle grouping and filtering based on this parameter.
Despite the abundance of available software tools, optimal particle selection is still a vital issue in single-particle cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM). Regardless of the method used, most pickers struggle when ice thickness varies on a micrograph. IceBreaker allows users to estimate the relative ice gradient and flatten it by equalizing the local contrast. It allows the differentiation of particles from the background and improves overall particle picking performance. Furthermore, we introduce an additional parameter corresponding to local ice thickness for each particle. Particles with a defined ice thickness can be grouped and filtered based on this parameter during processing. These functionalities are especially valuable for on-the-fly processing to automatically pick as many particles as possible from each micrograph and to select optimal regions for data collection. Finally, estimated ice gradient distributions can be stored separately and used to inspect the quality of prepared samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据