4.5 Article

Diffusion Smoothing for Spatial Point Patterns

期刊

STATISTICAL SCIENCE
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 123-142

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/21-STS825

关键词

Adaptive smoothing; bandwidth; heat kernel; kernel estimation; lagged arrival method; Richardson extrapolation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP130104470, DP130102322]
  2. Grains Research and Development Corporation
  3. University of Western Australia
  4. Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund [15-UOO-192, 19UOO-191]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops a practical statistical methodology combining traditional kernel methods with diffusion smoothing for estimating the density of two-dimensional spatial point pattern data. Diffusion smoothing exhibits better adaptive performance and robustness compared to traditional Gaussian kernel smoothing, and it can be applied in various fields such as archaeology and epidemiology.
Traditional kernel methods for estimating the spatially-varying density of points in a spatial point pattern may exhibit unrealistic artefacts, in addition to the familiar problems of bias and over- or under-smoothing. Performance can be improved by using diffusion smoothing, in which the smoothing kernel is the heat kernel on the spatial domain. This paper develops diffusion smoothing into a practical statistical methodology for two-dimensional spatial point pattern data. We clarify the advantages and disadvantages of diffusion smoothing over Gaussian kernel smoothing. Adaptive smoothing, where the smoothing bandwidth is spatially-varying, can be performed by adopting a spatially-varying diffusion rate: this avoids technical problems with adaptive Gaussian smoothing and has substantially better performance. We introduce a new form of adaptive smoothing using lagged arrival times, which has good performance and improved robustness. Applications in archaeology and epidemiology are demonstrated. The methods are implemented in open-source R code.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据