4.3 Article

Effects of Soluble and Insoluble Dietary Fiber from Corn Bran on Pasting, Thermal, and Structural Properties of Corn Starch

期刊

STARCH-STARKE
卷 74, 期 5-6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.202100254

关键词

corn bran; corn starch; dietary fiber; pasting properties; rheological properties

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0400700, 2016YFD0400702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber from corn bran on the properties and microstructure of corn starch were investigated in this study. The addition of dietary fiber inhibited starch retrogradation and decreased the relaxation time of water. Both soluble and insoluble dietary fiber reduced the enthalpy of corn starch. Soluble dietary fiber significantly inhibited starch gelatinization and decreased viscosity.
In this study, the effects of various concentrations (1%, 2%, 3%, 5%) soluble dietary fiber (SDF) and insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) from corn bran on the pasting, rheological, and thermal properties and the microstructure of corn starch (CS) are investigated. The findings show that the addition of dietary fiber inhibits the short-term retrogradation of starch and decreases the relaxation time of weakly bound water. The SDF and IDF reduce endothermic enthalpy from 11.79 to 8.81 and 8.80 (J g(-1)), respectively (p < 0.05). The addition of SDF significantly inhibits the gelatinization of starch (p < 0.05), which reduces viscosity during CS pasting. In addition, 5% of SDF significantly (p < 0.05) reduces the wavenumber ratio value (1047 cm(-1)/1022 cm(-1)) from 0.906 to 0.861 and decreases the strength of the CS gel from 653.29 to 75.66. The CS-SDF gel shows a sheet-like network structure, while in the CS-IDF gel, IDF is embedded in a network structure. This research further expands the understanding of the interaction between dietary fiber and starch during processing and allows the improvement of high dietary fiber product quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据