4.7 Article

Mechanism and kinetic study of Paal-Knorr reaction based on in-situ MIR monitoring

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120280

关键词

In-situ FTIR; Paal-Knorr reaction; IR quantification; 2DCOS; Intermediate identification; Kinetic study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study thoroughly investigated the mechanism and kinetics of the Paal-Knorr reaction for pyrrole derivatives using in-situ FTIR spectroscopy, identifying and quantifying intermediate, reactants, and products. By establishing IR quantitative models, the influences of operating conditions on reaction processes were analyzed and a reaction kinetic model was built with calculated kinetic parameters. The in-situ FTIR monitoring combined with IR analysis methods proved to be a powerful tool for revealing the reaction mechanism and kinetics.
An in-depth understanding of reaction processes is beneficial to the development and quality control of chemical products. In this work, the mechanism and kinetics of the Paal-Knorr reaction for pyrrole derivatives are thoroughly studied using in-situ Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The hemiacetal amine intermediate, reactants, and products were identified and quantified by the treatment of real-time infrared spectra via chemometrics method and two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2DCOS) technique. Based on the IR quantitative models, influences of operating conditions on reaction processes were investigated, and the reaction kinetic model was built with kinetic parameters of two rate-limiting reaction steps calculated. This approach of analysis on the in-situ FTIR data demonstrated the ability to extract useful information on reaction components, especially the intermediate spectrum, from the confounding real-time IR data. The in-situ FTIR monitoring combined with the IR analysis methods is proved as a powerful tool for revealing the reaction mechanism and kinetics. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据