4.6 Article

Proppant Transport Using High-Viscosity Friction Reducer Fracture Fluids at High-Temperature Environment

期刊

SPE JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 60-76

出版社

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/206750-PA

关键词

-

资金

  1. Libyan Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  2. Sebha University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stimulation of unconventional reservoirs to improve oil productivity in tight formations requires reliable fracture fluids with high viscosity and elasticity. However, high temperatures can negatively affect the effectiveness of these fluids. This study compared the performance of HVFRs and guar at different temperatures and found that HVFRs have better proppant transport capability but decreased viscosity and elasticity at temperatures above 75 degrees C. Simulation of field conditions under high temperatures is crucial for enhancing fracture treatment results.
The stimulation of unconventional reservoirs to improve oil productivity in tight formations of shale basins is a key objective in hydraulic fracturing treatments. Such stimulation can be made by reliable fracture fluids that have a high viscosity and elasticity to suspend the proppant in the fracture networks. Recently, due to several operational and economic reasons, the oil industry began using high-viscosity friction reducers (HVFRs) as direct replacements for linear and crosslinked gels. However, some issues can limit the capability of HVFRs to provide effective sand transport, including the high fluid temperature during fracture treatment inside the formations. This may lead to unstable fracture fluids caused by a decrease in the interconnective strength between the fluid chains, which results in reduced viscosity and elasticity. This study comprehensively investigated HVFRs in comparison with guar at various temperatures. An HVFR at 4 gallons per thousand gallons of water (gpt) and guar at 25 pounds per thousand gallons of water (ppt) were selected based on fluid rheology tests and hydraulic fracture execution field results. The rheological measurements of both fracture fluids were conducted at different temperature values (i.e., 25, 50, 75, and 100 degrees C). Static and dynamic proppant settling tests were also conducted at the same temperatures. The results showed that the HVFR provided better proppant transport capability than the guar. The HVFR had better thermal stability than guar, but its viscosity and elasticity decreased significantly when the temperature exceeded 75 degrees C. An HVFR can carry and hold the proppant more deeply inside the fracture than liner gel, but that ability decreases as the temperature increases. Therefore, using conditions that mimic field conditions to measure the fracture fluid rheology, proppant static settling velocity, and proppant dune development under a high temperature is crucial for enhancing the fracture treatment results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据