4.5 Article

Ligand design strategy to construct metal-organic frameworks with high-density carboxylic groups and high protonic conduction

期刊

SOLID STATE SCIENCES
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2021.106792

关键词

MOFs; Carboxylic acid; Protonic conduction; Mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22071223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the synthesis of crystalline solid materials with high proton conductivity. Two one-dimensional MOFs were prepared using a multifunctional organic ligand. The results showed that the MOFs exhibited high proton conductivity and stability, making them promising candidates for proton conducting MOFs.
Nowadays, the synthesis of crystalline solid materials with high proton conductivity, and excellent stability has become an important research topic. Bearing this in mind, we select a multifunctional organic ligand, 4-(2,4,6tricarboxyphenyl)-2,2 ',6,2 ''-terpyridine (H3tcp) that holds three carboxylate and three pyridine units to solvothermal prepare two one-dimensional MOFs, {[Cu(H1.5tcp)Cl0.5(H2O)0.5]center dot 0.2H2O}n (1) and {[Cu(H2tcp) (H2O)]center dot 1/2SO4 center dot 2H2O}n (2). Note that both the two MOFs contain a large amount of free carboxylate units and complicated H-bonded systems benefiting the proton transmission. AC impedance analyses demonstrated that their highest H2O-assisted proton conductivities (a) could be 4.45 x 10-4 and 4.23 x 10-4 S cm-1 at 90 degrees C and 98% RH, respectively. Apparently, the high a values are due to the efficient proton hopping across the H-bonding network built by the adsorbed H2O molecules and chemical composition such as, free -COOH and crystalline solvent units inside the frameworks. Furthermore, the lower Ea values of 1 (0.22 eV) and 2 (0.13 eV) under 98% RH confirm that the protons can effectively hop along the H-bonded networks. This research offers a new inspiration for the preparation of high proton conducting MOFs with free carboxylic groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据