4.5 Article

Electrochemical characteristics of grain boundaries in gadolinium and aluminum co-doped ceria and ceria-alumina composites

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2021.115771

关键词

Ceria; Kelvin probe force microscopy; Grain boundary potential barrier

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [387282673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the influence of different concentrations of Al2O3 addition on the electrochemical characteristics of ceria and Gd-doped ceria samples. The results showed that the addition of Al2O3 altered the distribution of Volta potential at grain boundaries, leading to an increased potential difference between bulk and grain boundary cores, as well as a broadening of the potential gradient at the grain boundaries.
The influence of 1, 2, 4 and 10 cat.% Al2O3 addition on the electrochemical characteristics of commercially available 10 cat.% Gd-doped ceria and a 1:1 cat.% mixture of CeO2:Al2O3 were evaluated in our study. Analysis of the electronic conductivity and polarization-relaxation behavior of the samples showed that an Ohmic contribution to the total electronic resistance cannot only be attributed to the electrode contact resistance but is a combined contribution from the electrode interface and decreased pO(2) dependence of the grain boundary resistivity of the material. The average electrical potential barrier at the grain boundaries was calculated from impedance spectroscopy data at 50-300 degrees C. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measurements were used to analyze the local Volta potential distribution at the grain boundaries of pure Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 and of samples with 4 and 10 cat.% Al addition at room temperature. KPFM measurements showed clear evidence for an increased Volta potential difference between bulk and grain boundary cores and for a considerable broadening of the Volta potential gradient at the grain boundaries with increasing Al concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据