4.7 Article

Elastic and plastic deformations in a high entropy alloy investigated using a nanoindentation method

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 118-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2015.10.002

关键词

High-entropy alloys; Incipient plasticity; Indentation size effect; Dislocation dynamics; Nanoindentation

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-1408722]
  2. ROC [MOST103-2221-E-008-028-MY3]
  3. DOE-Nuclear Energy University Program [DE-NE0000693]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1408722] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We employed instrumented indentation technique to study the elastic and plastic deformations in a facecentered cubic (fcc) high-entropy alloy NiFeCoCrMn. Single-crystal Ni was also examined for direct comparison. Tests were carried out using indenters with different tip radii to investigate the effect of indented volume on deformation processes. It was found that when the tip radius increased, the shear stress required for the occurrence of indentation pop-in decreased, which was attributable to a higher probability to find dislocations under a larger tip radius. We proposed a statistical model to describe the results quantitatively. In the plastic region, NiFeCoCrMn was much stronger than Ni, presumably resulted from a large lattice distortion in the multicomponent NiFeCoCrMn alloy. We found that the response of both materials at large indentation depth could be described by the classical Nix-Gao model, but when the indentation depth was shallow, the indenter tip must be treated as a sphere and Swadener's model offered a better description. In any event, it was necessary to introduce a scaling factor f to describe the effective stressed volume underneath the indenter tip to compensate for the overestimated hardness values. A map of indentation pressure against dislocation density was also summarized in this study. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据