4.6 Article

High-performance ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell optimized by silvaco tools

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 282-289

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.072

关键词

Ultrathin CIGS; Rear-passivation; Recombination; Pitch; Absorber

资金

  1. Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) [PN20-35EE-03]
  2. Semiconductor Laboratory, Kuwait University [GE01/08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research investigated the impact of various factors on ultrathin CIGS solar cell performance, finding that using thin film Al2O3 for rear-passivation can significantly improve cell performance by reducing rear side contact recombination losses. However, poor passivation was observed with high density of positive charge or high contact resistance at the interface. The optimal combination led to achieving the best cell performance.
In this work, we investigated the influence of the cell pitch, opening width, Ga/(In + Ga) ratio, absorber layer thickness, and doping on ultrathin CIGS solar cell performance by using ATLAS tools. First, to validate our investigated solar cell, we discuss and compare our simulation models with fabricated cells with/without rear-passivation Al2O3/Cu(In1-xGax)Se-2. We observed significant improvements in cell performance while using a thin film Al2O3 for the rear-passivation with a high density of negative charge, where the rear side contact recombination losses can then be reduced. The simulation results follow the experimental trends, highlighting the beneficial effects of rear-passivation in the ultrathin absorber layer. However, poor passivation was observed when a rear-passivation layer is with a high density of positive charge or in high contact resistance at Ag/CIGS interface. Consequently, the optimum combination led to achieving 14.30% with 10(16) cm(-3), 2.5 mu m, and 250 nm for absorber doping, cell pitch, and cell width, respectively. The obtained results from the simulated cells were compared to the recently published research work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据