4.7 Article

Material point method for large-deformation modeling of coseismic landslide and liquefaction-induced dam failure

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106907

关键词

Large deformation; Seismic slope stability; Landslide; Soil liquefaction; Dam failure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [52179134, 52039005]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) [16214519]
  3. NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme [51861165102]
  4. (NSFC) [N_HKUST621/18]
  5. (RGC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Material Point Method (MPM) was improved in this study to simulate coseismic slope stability and liquefaction-induced embankment failure under earthquake loading. The results demonstrate the advantage of MPM in handling liquefaction-induced large deformations, with the potential to quantitatively assess risks and consequences associated with seismic slope failure and soil liquefaction.
In this study, Material Point Method (MPM) is improved to simulate coseismic slope stability and liquefactioninduced embankment failure under earthquake loading. First, by using elastic or elastoplastic models, topographic amplification and different slope failure modes are analyzed considering the effects of slope geometry, soil properties and excitation frequencies etc. The MPM model is then applied to predict a cascading slope failure process, including triggering, shear band formation, runoff and final deposition. Finally, a fully nonlinear bounding surface soil model is implemented in the two-phase soil-water coupled MPM framework to investigate the liquefaction mechanism and associated dam failure using two case histories. The numerical results are generally comparable with the post-failure profiles obtained from field investigation, which highlight the advantage of MPM in handling liquefaction-induced large deformation. The MPM shows great promise to quantitatively assess risk and consequence associated with seismic slope failure and soil liquefaction, thereby, advance the performance-based engineering design and analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据