4.8 Article

Nanobugs as Drugs: Bacterial Derived Nanomagnets Enhance Tumor Targeting and Oncolytic Activity of HSV-1 Virus

期刊

SMALL
卷 18, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202104763

关键词

breast cancer; magnetosomes; magnetic targeting; nanomedicine; nanoparticles; oncolytic virotherapy

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK (CRUK) [C25574/A24321]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K005138/1]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant [777682]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K005138/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coassembly of magnetic nanoparticles and herpes simplex virus enhances tumor targeting, protects the virus, promotes immune response, and leads to tumor shrinkage and increased survival.
The survival strategies of infectious organisms have inspired many therapeutics over the years. Indeed the advent of oncolytic viruses (OVs) exploits the uncontrolled replication of cancer cells for production of their progeny resulting in a cancer-targeting treatment that leaves healthy cells unharmed. Their success against inaccessible tumors however, is highly variable due to inadequate tumor targeting following systemic administration. Coassembling herpes simplex virus (HSV1716) with biocompatible magnetic nanoparticles derived from magnetotactic bacteria enables tumor targeting from circulation with magnetic guidance, protects the virus against neutralizing antibodies and thereby enhances viral replication within tumors. This approach additionally enhances the intratumoral recruitment of activated immune cells, promotes antitumor immunity and immune cell death, thereby inducing tumor shrinkage and increasing survival in a syngeneic mouse model of breast cancer by 50%. Exploiting the properties of such a nanocarrier, rather than tropism of the virus, for active tumor targeting offers an exciting, novel approach for enhancing the bioavailability and treatment efficacy of tumor immunotherapies for disseminated neoplasms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据