4.8 Article

Nanovaccines Mediated Subcutis-to-Intestine Cascade for Improved Protection against Intestinal Infections

期刊

SMALL
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202105530

关键词

cellular immune responses; intestinal infections; mucosal immune responses; nanovaccines; subcutis-to-intestine cascade

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81925036, 81872814]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Sichuan Province [2018SZDZX0018]
  3. 111 project [B18035]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A proposed subcutis-to-intestine cascade using nanovaccines efficiently enhances cellular and mucosal immune responses. Experimental results demonstrate that nanovaccines can generate protective immunity against Salmonella challenge.
Parenteral vaccines typically can prime systemic humoral immune response, but with limited effects on cellular and mucosal immunity. Here, a subcutis-to-intestine cascade for navigating nanovaccines to address this limitation is proposed. This five-step cascade includes lymph nodes targeting, uptaken by dendritic cells (DCs), cross-presentation of antigens, increasing CCR9 expression on DCs, and driving CD103(+) DCs to mesenteric lymph nodes, in short, the LUCID cascade. Specifically, mesoporous silica nanoparticles are encapsulated with antigen and adjuvant toll-like receptor 9 agonist cytosine-phosphate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotides, and further coated by a lipid bilayer containing all-trans retinoic acid. The fabricated nanovaccines efficiently process the LUCID cascade to dramatically augment cellular and mucosal immune responses. Importantly, after being vaccinated with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium antigen-loaded nanovaccine, the mice generate protective immunity against challenge of S. Typhimurium. These findings reveal the efficacy of nanovaccines mediated subcutis-to-intestine cascade in simultaneously activating cellular and mucosal immune responses against mucosal infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据