4.6 Review

Asthma and obstructive sleep apnoea in adults and children e an up-to-date review

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101564

关键词

Asthma; Sleep; Lung function; CPAP; Adenotonsillectomy

资金

  1. NIHR Manchester BRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and asthma are common respiratory disorders that may complicate each other's clinical course. OSA can modify asthmatic airway inflammation and control, while asthma and its medications increase upper airway collapsibility, exacerbating OSA. Continuous positive pressure may improve asthma control in patients with both diseases, but there is limited evidence on the action of anti-asthma medications in the same patients.
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and asthma are two common respiratory disorders in children and adults. Apart from common risk factors, such as obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease and allergic rhinitis, emerging evidence suggest that the two diseases may complicate the clinical course of each other. On one hand, OSA modifies asthmatic airway inflammation and is associated with poor asthma control. On the other hand, asthma and its medications increase the collapsibility of the upper airways contributing to the development and worsening of OSA. The overnight respiratory symptoms of OSA and asthma are often similar, and an inpatient polysomnography is often necessary for a proper diagnosis, especially in children. Continuous positive pressure, the gold standard treatment for OSA can improve asthma control in patients suffering from both diseases. However, there is limited evidence how anti-asthma medications act in the same patients. Nevertheless, adenotonsillectomy seems to be effective in children with concomitant asthma and OSA. This review summarises the evidence for the bidirectional link between asthma and OSA, focuses on diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and highlights the need for further research. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据