4.7 Article

Ionic liquid screening for dichloromethane absorption by multi-scale simulations

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119187

关键词

Ionic liquids; Dichloromethane absorption; COSMO-RS; Process simulation

资金

  1. International (Regional) Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21961160744]
  2. Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21890764]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21921005]
  4. Henan Major Science and Technology Project [201300310900]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Henan [202300410004]
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [1082218-E-002-066-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through multi-scale investigation and optimization using the COSMO-RS model, 1-ethyl-1-methylpiperidinium acetate was identified as the optimal IL for DCM absorption with excellent performance and the lowest operational cost among the studied cases.
Ionic liquids (ILs) have been proposed as potential solvents for absorbing dichloromethane (DCM), while screening a promising IL with high absorption performances from numerous ILs remains challenging. In this work, a framework of multi-scale investigation on DCM absorption using ILs was established. A screening method based on COSMO-RS model that optimized by 79 reported experimental data points was proposed, and the effect of cationic and anionic structures on DCM absorption and the mechanisms were systematically studied combining quantum chemical calculation. Based on the above results, 1-ethyl-1-methylpiperidinium acetate ([C(2)MPi(p)][C1COO]) was determined as the optimal IL for DCM absorption with Henry's Constant of 3.29 kPa. The screened IL was further evaluated through process simulation comparing to the conventional IL and traditional organic solvent. The annual variable operation cost of [C(2)MPi(p)][C1COO]-based process for DCM absorption was the lowest among the studied cases, showing broad prospects in applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据