4.6 Article

Perception, Positioning and Decision-Making Algorithms Adaptation for an Autonomous Valet Parking System Based on Infrastructure Reference Points Using One Single LiDAR

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22030979

关键词

valet parking; autonomous vehicle; LiDAR; parking maneuver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autonomous parking valet systems can enhance user comfort by assisting with parking space search and maneuvering. This paper focuses on integrating perception, positioning, decision-making, and maneuvering algorithms for autonomous vehicles in parking lots, using a single LiDAR sensor without additional infrastructure sensors. Tests in a real parking lot with metallic canopies showed accurate behavior.
Autonomous parking valet systems improve users' comfort, helping with the task of searching for a parking space and parking maneuvering; and due to the simple infrastructure design and low speeds, this maneuver is quite feasible for automated vehicles. Various demonstrations have been performed in both closed parking and in open air parking; scenarios that allow the use of specific technological tools for navigation and searching for a parking space. However, there are still challenges. The purpose of this paper was the integration of perception, positioning, decision-making, and maneuvering algorithms for the control of an autonomous vehicle in a parking lot with the support of a single LiDAR sensor, and with no additional sensors in the infrastructure. Based on a digital map, which was as simplified as possible, the driver can choose the range of parking spaces in which the vehicle must look for a space. From that moment on, the vehicle moves, looking for free places until an available one in the range selected by the driver is found. Then, the vehicle performs the parking maneuver, choosing between two alternatives to optimize the required space. Tests in a real parking lot, with spaces covered with metallic canopies, showed an accurate behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据