4.6 Article

An Investigation on a Plane-Based Dynamic Calibration Method for the Handheld LiDAR Scanner

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22010369

关键词

calibration; handheld LiDAR scanner; Velodyne VLP-16; least-squares adjustment

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C [MOST 109-2221-E-004-001]
  2. [109-2221-E-004-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plane-based dynamic calibration method was proposed for the GeoSLAM ZEB Horizon handheld LiDAR scanner, and its efficiency was investigated through multiple datasets collected at different times and dates. The calibration results showed that the proposed method significantly reduced average residuals, improved the RMSE of check planes, and demonstrated consistent results across different calibration data.
A plane-based dynamic calibration method had been proposed by the previous study for the GeoSLAM ZEB Horizon handheld LiDAR scanner. Only one preliminary test was presented. Therefore, three datasets in a calibration field were collected in this study on different dates and at different times on the same date to investigate the efficiency of the proposed calibration approach and calibration results. The calibration results for these three datasets showed that all average residuals were closer to 0, and all a posterior unit weight standard deviations of the adjustment were also significantly reduced after calibration. Moreover, the RMSE (root mean square error) of the check planes was improved by about an average of 32.61%, 28.44%, and 14.7%, respectively, for the three datasets. The improvement was highly correlated with the quality of the calibration data. The RMSE differences of all check planes using calibration data collected on different dates and at different times on the same date for calibration was about 1-2 cm and less than 1 mm, respectively. There was no difference in the calibration results, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed calibration approach and the calibration results during the two different dates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据