4.6 Article

Volitional EMG Estimation Method during Functional Electrical Stimulation by Dual-Channel Surface EMGs

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21238015

关键词

electromyography (EMG); EMG-controlled FES; functional electrical stimulation (FES); m-wave; stimulus artifact; volitional EMG (vEMG)

资金

  1. ICT R&D program of MSIT/IITP [2017-0-00050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel dual-channel electromyography method was proposed to estimate volitional electromyography signals during functional electrical stimulation. Experimental results showed that the method performed better under rapidly modulated stimulation intensities.
We propose a novel dual-channel electromyography (EMG) spatio-temporal differential (DESTD) method that can estimate volitional electromyography (vEMG) signals during time-varying functional electrical stimulation (FES). The proposed method uses two pairs of EMG signals from the same stimulated muscle to calculate the spatio-temporal difference between the signals. We performed an experimental study with five healthy participants to evaluate the vEMG signal estimation performance of the DESTD method and compare it with that of the conventional comb filter and Gram-Schmidt methods. The normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) values between the semi-simulated raw vEMG signal and vEMG signals which were estimated using the DESTD method and conventional methods, and the two-tailed t-test and analysis of variance were conducted. The results showed that under the stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle with rapid and dynamically modulated stimulation intensity, the DESTD method had a lower NRMSE compared to the conventional methods (p < 0.01) for all stimulation intensities (maximum 5, 10, 15, and 20 mA). We demonstrated that the DESTD method could be applied to wearable EMG-controlled FES systems because it estimated vEMG signals more effectively compared to the conventional methods under dynamic FES conditions and removed unnecessary FES-induced EMG signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据