4.6 Article

Artificial Neural Network Detects Hip Muscle Forces as Determinant for Harmonic Walking in People after Stroke

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22041374

关键词

artificial intelligence; gait analysis; gait; golden ratio; quadriceps; iliopsoas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many recent studies have shown that the harmony of physiological walking depends on the proportions between the phases of the gait cycle. The gait cycle assumes a fractal structure when the proportion is close to the golden ratio. In stroke patients, this harmony is disrupted, and it is unclear which factor is associated with the ratios between gait phases. Using an artificial neural network, researchers found that the gait ratio is associated with walking speed, stride length, and hip muscle forces.
Many recent studies have highlighted that the harmony of physiological walking is based on a specific proportion between the durations of the phases of the gait cycle. When this proportion is close to the so-called golden ratio (about 1.618), the gait cycle assumes an autosimilar fractal structure. In stroke patients this harmony is altered, but it is unclear which factor is associated with the ratios between gait phases because these relationships are probably not linear. We used an artificial neural network to determine the weights associable to each factor for determining the ratio between gait phases and hence the harmony of walking. As expected, the gait ratio obtained as the ratio between stride duration and stance duration was found to be associated with walking speed and stride length, but also with hip muscle forces. These muscles could be important for exploiting the recovery of energy typical of the pendular mechanism of walking. Our study also highlighted that the results of an artificial neural network should be associated with a reliability analysis, being a non-deterministic approach. A good level of reliability was found for the findings of our study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据