4.6 Article

Fish Segmentation in Sonar Images by Mask R-CNN on Feature Maps of Conditional Random Fields

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21227625

关键词

fish segmentation; sonar images; conditional random fields; mask R-CNN

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology and Fisheries Agency, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan [MOST 110-2221-E-019-048, 110AS-6.2.1-FA-F6]
  2. Fisheries Agency, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a method combining Mask R-CNN and PreCNN for fish segmentation in sonar images, improving accuracy and applicability. Using the PreCNN network to extract feature maps, providing standardized inputs for Mask R-CNN, making it better suited for different fish farming environments.
Imaging sonar systems are widely used for monitoring fish behavior in turbid or low ambient light waters. For analyzing fish behavior in sonar images, fish segmentation is often required. In this paper, Mask R-CNN is adopted for segmenting fish in sonar images. Sonar images acquired from different shallow waters can be quite different in the contrast between fish and the background. That difference can make Mask R-CNN trained on examples collected from one fish farm ineffective to fish segmentation for the other fish farms. In this paper, a preprocessing convolutional neural network (PreCNN) is proposed to provide standardized feature maps for Mask R-CNN and to ease applying Mask R-CNN trained for one fish farm to the others. PreCNN aims at decoupling learning of fish instances from learning of fish-cultured environments. PreCNN is a semantic segmentation network and integrated with conditional random fields. PreCNN can utilize successive sonar images and can be trained by semi-supervised learning to make use of unlabeled information. Experimental results have shown that Mask R-CNN on the output of PreCNN is more accurate than Mask R-CNN directly on sonar images. Applying Mask R-CNN plus PreCNN trained for one fish farm to new fish farms is also more effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据