4.3 Review

Decision making at extreme prematurity: Innovation in clinician education

期刊

SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151529

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eunice Ken-nedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health [R01HD094794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decision-making at extreme prematurity presents challenges and distress for parents and clinicians. Clinicians need to learn necessary skills for counseling and decision-making in these situations. Educational strategies that incorporate adult learning theory, multidisciplinary team simulation, and critical reflection show promising results in optimizing antenatal counseling and shared decision-making for families facing extreme prematurity.
Decision-making at extreme prematurity remains ethically and practically challenging and can result in parental and clinician distress. It is vital that clinicians learn the necessary skills integral to counseling and decision-making with families in these situations. A pedagogical approach to teaching counseling should incorporate adult learning theory, emphasize multidisciplinary team in-situ simulation that links to counseling clinicians' daily practice, and includes critical reflection, debriefing, and program assessment. Multiple educational strategies that train clinicians in advanced communication and decision-making offer promising results to optimize antenatal counseling and shared decision-making for families facing possible delivery at extreme prematurity. Continued process evaluation and innovation in these educational domains are needed while also assessing the effect on patient-centered outcomes. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据