4.6 Article

Curing pancreatic cancer

期刊

SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 232-246

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.05.030

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; Oncogenesis; Surgery; (Neo-)adjuvant treatment; Translational research

类别

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [TR 1663/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic cancer presents unique challenges to clinicians, researchers, and patients due to its distinct biology. While surgery remains the only curative option, new developments in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments are emerging, offering hope for more successful ways to cure the disease.
The distinct biology of pancreatic cancer with aggressive and early invasive tumor cells, a tumor promoting microenvironment, late diagnosis, and high therapy resistance poses major challenges on clinicians, researchers, and patients. In current clinical practice, a curative approach for pancreatic cancer can only be offered to a minority of patients and even for those patients, the long-term outcome is grim. This bitter combination will eventually let pancreatic cancer rise to the second leading cause of cancer-related mortalities. With surgery being the only curative option, complete tumor resection still remains the center of pancreatic cancer treatment. In recent years, new developments in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment have emerged. Together with improved perioperative care including complication management, an increasing number of patients have become eligible for tumor resection. Basic research aims to further increase these numbers by new methods of early detection, better tumor modelling and personalized treatment options. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on clinical and biologic features, surgical and non-surgical treatment options, and the improved collaboration of clinicians and basic researchers in pancreatic cancer that will hopefully result in more successful ways of curing pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据