4.7 Article

Deciphering the role of multiple generations of annealing twins on texture evolution in cold-rolled high entropy alloys during annealing

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114221

关键词

High entropy alloys; Recrystallization; Transmission Kikuchi diffraction; Grain boundary misorientation; Annealing twins

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2020R1A2C1010134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In low stacking fault energy (SFE) materials, the occurrence of multiple generations of annealing twins (MGAT) leads to significant texture weakening and the evolution of new texture components. Investigating the twin clusters and potential nucleation sites of MGAT provides insights into their contribution to texture development.
The occurrence of multiple generations of annealing twins (MGAT) in low stacking fault energy (SFE) materials leads to significant texture weakening with the evolution of some new prominent texture components. However, the exact correlation between MGAT and texture evolution is a long-standing enigma. In the current research, the presence of MGAT was confirmed by transmission Kikuchi diffraction (TKD) and high resolution electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) in partially (700 degrees C/5 min) and fully (700 degrees C/1 h) recrystallized specimens of equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy, respectively. Further, the twin clusters in the vicinity of the potential nucleation sites (Brass, Goss and S orientations) were investigated to gain insights on the contribution of MGAT on texture development. The newly developed (phi(1) = 90 degrees, Phi= 30 degrees, phi(2) = 45 degrees) orientation showed its roots originating from 2nd generation twin of the Brass orientation while Cube orientation was evolved from the 1st and 5th generation twins of the S orientation. (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据