4.7 Article

Mechanical response of the constrained nanostructured layer in heterogeneous laminate

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114310

关键词

Heterostructure; Nanostructure; Strength and uniform elongation; Strain bands; Mechanical constraint

资金

  1. NSFC [51931003, 11890681, 12032001, 1210020469]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [BX2021011, 2020M680223]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0204403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study quantitatively investigates the mechanical response of a nanostructured Cu-10Zn layer constrained by coarse-grained Cu layers, revealing unique mechanical behaviors attributed to inter-layer constraint. The nanostructured layer displays large uniform elongation, moderate work hardening, and gradually reduced engineering stress, mainly due to the dispersed stable strain bands formed by the inter-layer constraint, enabling extensive activation of mechanical twinning and stacking faults. These findings provide new insights into the deformation and load-bearing mechanisms of heterostructures.
A B S T R A C T Understanding the inter-zone interaction-dependent mechanical behavior of constituent zones in het-erostructured material is fundamental but challenging. Here we report quantitative investigations on the mechanical response of a nanostructured Cu-10Zn layer constrained by coarse-grained Cu layers in a lam-inate. The nanostructure layer displays large uniform elongation, moderate work hardening but gradually reduced engineering stress. Such unique responses are primarily attributed to the inter-layer constraint, which leads to the formation of dispersed stable strain bands and thus enables extensive activation of mechanical twinning and stacking faults. These findings provide new insights into the deformation and load-bearing mechanisms of heterostructures. (c) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据