4.7 Article

Elastic energy of multi-component solid solutions and strain origins of phase stability in high-entropy alloys

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114226

关键词

High-entropy alloys; Phase stability; Phase selection; Hume-Rothery rules; Atomic-size effects; Glass formation

资金

  1. Heisenberg programme of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [DA 1655/2-1]
  2. [DA 1655/1-2]
  3. [SPP1713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study derives the elastic energy of mixing for multi-component solid solutions by generalizing Eshelby's model and proposes that most solid solution multi-component alloys are stable when lambda* < 0.16. It also reveals that the polydispersity index delta can directly represent the elastic energy, providing support for quantitative assessments of the thermodynamic properties of high-entropy alloys.
The elastic energy of mixing for multi-component solid solutions is derived by generalizing Eshelby's sphere-in-hole model. By surveying the dependence of the elastic energy on the chemical composition and lattice misfit, we derive a lattice strain coefficient lambda*. Studying several high-entropy alloys and super alloys, we propose that most solid solution multi-component alloys are stable when lambda* < 0 . 16 , generalizing the Hume-Rothery atomic-size rule for binary alloys. We also reveal that the polydispersity index delta , frequently used for describing strain in multi-component alloys, directly represents the elastic energy (e ) with e = q delta(2) , q being an elastic constant. Furthermore, the effects of (i) the number and (ii) the atomic size distribution of constituting elements on the phase stability of high-entropy alloys were quantified. The present derivations and discussions open for richer considerations of elastic effects in high-entropy alloys, offering immediate support for quantitative assessments of their thermodynamic properties and studying related strengthening mechanisms. (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据