4.7 Article

Abscisic acid mitigates NaCl toxicity in grapevine by influencing phytochemical compounds and mineral nutrients in leaves

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110336

关键词

Antioxidant enzymes; Compatible solutes; Grape; Growth regulator; Salinity

资金

  1. Malayer University [84.5253]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that ABA at a certain concentration can improve the morphometrical and phytochemical parameters of grapevine under salt stress conditions, enhancing the plant's ability to mitigate NaCl toxicity.
The effect of abscisic acid (ABA) at 0 and 100 mu M on some morphometrical, and phytochemical parameters and mineral nutrient changes of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. 'Sultana') were examined during ten weeks salinity stress (NaCl; 0, 25, 50 and 100 mM). At the end of first week of saline treatments, the vines were sprayed with ABA twice a day at a 12 h interval. Under saline condition, the plants height, leaves number, leaves area and shoots dry matter decreased significantly compared to the control non-saline stressed vines, but these parameters were improved in 100 mu M ABA-treated vines under saline condition. The increase in leaf electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation and hydrogen peroxide production in cell biomembranes caused by salinity stress were reduced in 100 mu M ABA-sprayed vines. Moreover, leaf relative water content, proline, soluble sugars, total phenolic, and flavonoids increased in these vines compared to non-ABA-treated vines under salinity condition. ABA (100 mu M) had an additive effect on leaf antioxidant enzymes (catalase, guaiacol peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase) activities of salt-stressed vines. Salt stress affects negatively the leaf elements concentrations, however ABA (100 mu M) improved their accumulation. These ABA- induced morphometrical and phytochemical changes improved the ability of grapevine plants to mitigate NaCl toxicity under saline condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据