4.8 Article

Multiple omics study identifies an interspecies conserved driver for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 624, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg8117

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81630011, 81970364, 81970070]
  2. Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91639304]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational Research [2016YFF0101504]
  4. Creative Groups Project of Hubei Province [2016CFA010]
  5. Hubei Science and Technology Support Project [2018BEC473]
  6. Hubei construction project of science and technology condition platform in Province [2017BEC001]
  7. scientific research project of Hubei Health Commission [WJ2019Q046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipotoxicity plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of NASH, with ALOX12 shown to exacerbate NASH severity by targeting ACC1, suggesting a potential therapeutic target.
Lipotoxicity is a recognized pathological trigger and accelerator of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, the molecular basis of lipotoxicity-induced NASH remains elusive. Here, we systematically mapped the changes in hepatic transcriptomic landscapes in response to lipotoxic insults across multiple species. Conserved and robust activation of the arachidonic acid pathway, in particular the arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase (ALOX12) gene, was closely correlated with NASH severity in humans, macaques with spontaneously developed NASH, as well as swine and mouse dietary NASH models. Using gain- and loss-of-function studies, we found that ALOX12 markedly exacerbated NASH in both mice and Bama pig models. ALOX12 was shown to induce NASH by directly targeting acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1) via a lysosomal degradation mechanism. Overall, our findings reveal a key molecular driver of NASH pathogenesis and suggest that ALOX12-ACC1 interaction may be a therapeutic target in NASH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据