4.7 Article

Interactions between periphytic biofilms and dissolved organic matter at soil-water interface and the consequent effects on soil phosphorus fraction changes

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 801, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149708

关键词

3D EEM; PARAFAC; Biomass decomposition; Paddy soil

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977101, 41825021]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20181511, BE2020731, BK20200057]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed the interactions between DOM and periphytic biofilms and their effects on changes in bioactive phosphorus fractions, providing practical information for designing periphytic biofilm based biofertilizers from the perspective of soil DOM.
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays vital roles in carbon and other nutrient transformation at soil-water interfaces (SWI) in paddy fields. It is associated with the growth and withering of periphytic biofilms. However, the interactions between DOM and periphytic biofilms remain largely unknown. In this study, a microcosm experiment with different initial DOM contents elucidated that the biomass, and biomass nitrogen and phosphorus contents were greatly influenced by humic-like substances (C2 and C3), while the growth of periphytic biofilms increased the contents of humic-like (C1 and C2) and tryptophan-like substances (C5) in soil. Moreover, the decomposition of periphytic biofilms significantly increased soil pH, DOM, C2, C3 and C5 contents, but caused decrease in Eh, with consequent reduce in water soluble phosphorus (WSP) and release of algal available phosphorus (AAP). Results from this study revealed how DOM interacts with periphytic biofilms and the consequent effects on changes of bioactive phosphorus fractions, and provide practical information for designing periphytic biofilm based biofertilizer from the perspective of soil DOM. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据