4.7 Article

Identifying dermal exposure as the dominant pathway of children's exposure to flame retardants in kindergartens

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 808, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152004

关键词

Flame retardants; Children; Dermal exposure route; Exposure pattern; Health risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977308, 42122057, 21806030]
  2. University Science and Technology Innovation Talent Support Program of Henan Province [20HASTIT011]
  3. Science Foundation of Henan Normal University [2016PL14, 20180572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that children are primarily exposed to brominated and organophosphate flame retardants through dermal contact, rather than inhalation or hand-to-mouth transmission.
Exploration of multiple sources of brominated (BFRs) and organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) for children promotes the understanding of exposure pathways and health risk. 10 BFRs and 9 OPFRs were measured in skin wipes from hands, forehead, and arms of 30 children, and surface wipe samples from sills, toys, desks and floors, and indoor air samples of kindergartens from Xinxiang, China. Higher 19OPFRs concentrations were observed in the forehead (1840 ng/m2), followed by hand (1420 ng/m2) and arm wipes (1130 ng/m2), and the 18BFRs concentrations in forehead, hand and arm wipes were 116, 315 and 165 ng/m2, respectively. The total concentration of OPFRs and BFRs in floor wipes (66.1 and 24.5 ng/m2) were lower than those in toy (205 and 535 ng/m2), sill (227 and 30.1 ng/m2) and desk (84.4 and 139 ng/m2) wipes. Concentrations of FRs in forehead wipes were significantly correlated with those in gaseous air (p < 0.05), moderate correlations were found between the hand wipes and surface wipes (p = 0.054). We estimated the daily average dosages (DADs) of children exposure to FRs via multiple pathways. Compared to DADs via inhalation and hand-to-mouth transfer, dermal exposure was determined to be the predominant exposure pathway to 19OPFRs and 18BFRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据