4.7 Article

Does the environmental history of mussels have an effect on the physiological response to additional stress under experimental conditions?

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 806, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149925

关键词

Environmental history; Mussel; Thermal stress; Transcriptomic response; Trade off; Genotype

资金

  1. French ANR agency (IPOC program) [ANR-12-ISV7-0004]
  2. Universite de Bretagne Occidentale
  3. Region Bretagne

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the response capacity of mussels in coastal ecosystems is influenced by both water temperature increase and environmental history, with a possible genetic basis in physiological response. Immune parameters of blue mussels were notably affected by extreme warming. There was no significant difference in response between hybrids and M galloprovincialis.
Expected effects on marine biota of the ongoing elevation of water temperature and high latitudes is of major concern when considering the reliability of coastal ecosystem production. To compare the capacity of coastal organisms to cope with a temperature increase depending on their environmental history, responses of adult blue mussels (Mytilus spp.) taken from two sites differentially exposed to chemical pollution were investigated during an experimental exposure to a thermal stress. Immune parameters were notably altered by extreme warming and transcriptional changes for a broad selection of genes were associated to the temperature increase following a two-step response pattern. Site-specific responses suggested an influence of environmental history and support the possibility of a genetic basis in the physiological response. However no meaningful difference was detected between the response of hybrids and M galloprovincialis. This study brings new information about the capacity of mussels to cope with the ongoing elevation of water temperature in these coastal ecosystems. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据