4.7 Article

The mechanisms of struvite biomineralization in municipal wastewater

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 799, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149261

关键词

Biomineralization; Struvite; Phosphorus recovery; Intracellular cluster; Municipal wastewater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the mechanisms of struvite production by biomineralization in municipal wastewater for five microorganisms, revealing different pathways for bio-struvite formation. Nutrient recovery through biomineralization has the potential to promote circularity within the wastewater industry, with various microorganisms showing promise for ortho-phosphate removal and bio-struvite generation.
The mechanisms of struvite production by biomineralization were investigated for five microorganisms (Bacillus pumilus, Brevibacterium antiquum, Myxococcus xanthus, Halobacterium salinarum and Idiomarina loihiensis) in mu-nicipal wastewater. The microbial exponential phase of growth occurred within the first 48 h of incubation, with growth rates varying from 0.02-0.08 1/h. These five microorganisms removed 23-27 mg/L (66-79%) of ortho-phosphate from wastewater, which was recovered as biological struvite (i.e., bio-struvite) identified by morpho-logical, X-ray diffraction and elemental analysis. Bio-struvite crystals occurred in a low extracellular supersatura-tion index (0.6-0.8 units). Bio-struvite formation in B. pumilus M. xanthus, H. salinarum cultures was linked to biologically induced mineralization. Whereas B. antiquum and I. loihiensis produced bio-struvite through biolog-ically controlled mineralization mechanism because the crystals presented homogeneity in morphology and size, and intracellular vesicle-like cell structures were observed enclosing electron-dense granules/materials. Nutrient recovery through biomineralization has potential application in wastewater streams promoting circularity within the wastewater industry. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据