4.7 Article

Performance and microbial community dynamics relationship within a step-feed anoxic/oxic/anoxic/oxic process (SF-A/O/A/O) for coking wastewater treatment

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 792, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148263

关键词

Coking wastewater; Step-feeding; Total nitrogen (TN); Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Microbial characteristics

资金

  1. Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program [C19H100010]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SF-A/OA/O process has demonstrated superior performance in full-scale coking wastewater treatment compared to the A/O/O process, showing efficient removal of COD, NH4+-N, TN, phenols, and cyanide. The abundance and structure of the microbial community may be key factors contributing to the strong stability of the SF-A/OA/O system.
A step-feed anoxic/oxic/anoxic/oxic (SF-A/O/A/O) was developed and successfully applied to full-scale coking wastewater treatment. The performance and microbial community were evaluated and systematically compared with the anoxic/oxic/oxic (A/O/O) process. SF-A/OA/O process exhibited efficient removal of COD, NH4+-N, TN, phenols, and cyanide with corresponding average effluent concentrations of 317.9, 1.8, 46.2, 1.1, and 0.2 mg.L-1, respectively. In particular, the TN removal efficiency of A/O/O process was only 7.8%, with an effluent concentration of 300.6 mg.L-1. Furthermore, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with high molecular weight were the dominant compounds in raw coking wastewater, which were degraded to a greater extent in SF-A/OA/O. The abundance in Thiobacillus, SM1A02, and Thauera could be the main reason why SF-A/O/A/O was superior to A/O/O in treating TN. The microbial community structure of SF-A/O/A/O was similar among stages in system (P >= 0.05, Welch's t-test) and was less affected by environmental factors, which may have been one of the important factors in the system's strong stability. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据