4.7 Article

Hydrophobic modification of waterborne polymer slows urea release and improves nitrogen use efficiency in rice

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 794, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148612

关键词

Controlled-release fertilizer; Hydrophobicity; Fluorinated polyacrylate; Silica; Nitrogen use efficiency

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0200704]
  2. Youth Foundation of Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2018QNJJ-033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that using a hydrophobic coating can significantly improve the controlled-release longevity of CRFs, leading to increased grain yield, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen use efficiency in rice production.
Controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs) with long release longevity have been actively sought to match the nutrient demands of crops over the entire growing period. Waterborne polymer is an environmental friendliness coating for CRFs because it neither uses organic solvent nor influences soil property. However, its low hydrophobicity leads to a short controlled-release longevity of CRFs coated with waterborne polymer. To overcome this drawback, a hydrophobic coating was fabricated using silica-modified fluorinated lauryl-methacrylate-containing polyacrylate (SFLPA). After hydrophobic modification, both a slower water influx rate and a larger modulus induced a reduced swelling rate and an extended controlled-release longevity consequently from 42 days to 108 days. Furthermore, a pot trial demonstrated that a single application of SFLPA-coated CRFs significantly boosted grain yield (by 13.36%), nitrogen uptake (by 17.44%) and nitrogen use efficiency (by 24.29%) compared to a three-split application of urea in rice production. The study demonstrated substantial potential of silica/ fluorinated waterborne polymer for improving the effectiveness of CRFs in rice production. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据