4.7 Article

Impact of EV load uncertainty on optimal planning for electric vehicle charging station

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 64, 期 11, 页码 2469-2476

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-021-1897-x

关键词

electric vehicle charging station; renewable energy; optimal planning; load uncertainty

资金

  1. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2018YFE0125300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52061130217]
  3. Science and Technology Project of State Grid Hunan Electric Power Co., Ltd. [5216A2200005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the optimal planning for grid-connected EVCS with RES, considering the uncertainty of EV load. The results show that applying RES can bring economic benefits, and different characteristics of EV load will influence the capacity of each device (PV, battery, converter) in the optimal planning of EVCS.
With the development of electric vehicle (EV), there is a huge demand for electric vehicle charging station (EVCS). The utilization of renewable energy sources (RES) in EVCS can not only decrease the energy fluctuation by participating in peakload reduction of the grid, but also reduce the pollution to the environment by cutting down the use of fossil fuels. In this paper, the optimal planning for grid-connected EVCS with RES is studied by considering EV load uncertainty. Nine scenarios are set based on a different characteristic of EV load to reveal the impact of EV load on net present cost (NPC) and to express the relationship between optimal capacity and energy flow. Moreover, since electricity price also plays an important role in EVCS planning, an economic comparison between different cases with different electricity price for peak-valley-flat period is carried out. The results reveal the economic benefits of applying RES in EVCS, and demonstrate that EV load with different characteristics would influence the capacity of each device (PV, battery, converter) in the EVCS optimal planning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据