4.8 Article

Molecular basis of immune evasion by the Delta and Kappa SARS-CoV-2 variants

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 374, 期 6575, 页码 1621-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abl8506

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [DP1AI158186, HHSN272201700059C]
  2. Pew Biomedical Scholars Award
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1156262]
  5. University of Washington Arnold and Mabel Beckman cryo-EM center
  6. National Institutes of Health [S10OD032290, U01 AI151698]
  7. Fast Grants
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1156262] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transmission of SARS-CoV-2 leads to the emergence of variants, such as the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, which dampens the in vitro potency of vaccine-elicited serum neutralizing antibodies. Mutations in the B.1.617.1 (Kappa) and Delta spike glycoproteins alter key antigenic sites, affecting the recognition by monoclonal antibodies. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding affinities of Kappa and Delta are comparable to the Wuhan-Hu-1 isolate, while Delta+ exhibits significantly reduced affinity.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission leads to the emergence of variants, including the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of concern that is causing a new wave of infections and has become globally dominant. We show that these variants dampen the in vitro potency of vaccine-elicited serum neutralizing antibodies and provide a structural framework for describing their immune evasion. Mutations in the B.1.617.1 (Kappa) and Delta spike glycoproteins abrogate recognition by several monoclonal antibodies via alteration of key antigenic sites, including remodeling of the Delta amino-terminal domain. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding affinities of the Kappa and Delta receptor binding domains are comparable to the Wuhan-Hu-1 isolate, whereas B.1.617.2+ (Delta+) exhibits markedly reduced affinity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据