4.8 Article

Population-specific neuromodulation prolongs therapeutic benefits of deep brain stimulation

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 374, 期 6564, 页码 201-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abi7852

关键词

-

资金

  1. Richard King Mellon Foundation Presidential Fellowship in the Life Sciences
  2. Lane Fellowship in Computational Biology
  3. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01NS101016, R01NS104835, R01NS117058, T32GM008208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that manipulating distinct neural subpopulations in the GPe through optogenetics can provide long-lasting therapeutic effects in dopamine-depleted mice, surpassing the effects of traditional DBS. By using synaptic differences and brief bursts of electrical stimulation to excite and inhibit different types of GPe neurons, the circuit-inspired DBS produced sustained therapeutic benefits extending beyond conventional DBS.
Symptoms of neurological diseases emerge through the dysfunction of neural circuits whose diffuse and intertwined architectures pose serious challenges for delivering therapies. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves Parkinson's disease symptoms acutely but does not differentiate between neuronal circuits, and its effects decay rapidly if stimulation is discontinued. Recent findings suggest that optogenetic manipulation of distinct neuronal subpopulations in the external globus pallidus (GPe) provides long-lasting therapeutic effects in dopamine-depleted (DD) mice. We used synaptic differences to excite parvalbumin-expressing GPe neurons and inhibit lim-homeobox-6-expressing GPe neurons simultaneously using brief bursts of electrical stimulation. In DD mice, circuit-inspired DBS provided long-lasting therapeutic benefits that far exceeded those induced by conventional DBS, extending several hours after stimulation. These results establish the feasibility of transforming knowledge of circuit architecture into translatable therapeutic approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据