4.8 Article

Voltage compartmentalization in dendritic spines in vivo

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 375, 期 6576, 页码 82-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abg0501

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01NS110422, R34NS116740]
  2. National Eye Institute (NEI) [R01EY011787]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [R01MH115900]
  4. PEW Latin American Fellows Program in Biomedical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic spines play a critical role in excitatory neurotransmission in the nervous system. The membrane potentials of spines and dendrites were measured during spontaneous activity and sensory stimulation in mice. Spines and dendrites were depolarized together during action potentials, but experienced different voltages during subthreshold and resting potentials. The regulation of voltage compartmentalization could have important implications for synaptic function and plasticity, dendritic integration, and disease states.
Dendritic spines mediate most excitatory neurotransmission in the nervous system, so their function must be critical for the brain. Spines are biochemical compartments but might also electrically modify synaptic potentials. Using two-photon microscopy and a genetically encoded voltage indicator, we measured membrane potentials in spines and dendrites from pyramidal neurons in the somatosensory cortex of mice during spontaneous activity and sensory stimulation. Spines and dendrites were depolarized together during action potentials, but, during subthreshold and resting potentials, spines often experienced different voltages than parent dendrites, even activating independently. Spine voltages remained compartmentalized after two-photon optogenetic activation of individual spine heads. We conclude that spines are elementary voltage compartments. The regulation of voltage compartmentalization could be important for synaptic function and plasticity, dendritic integration, and disease states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据