4.8 Article

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: Antibody evasion and cryo-EM structure of spike protein-ACE2 complex

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 375, 期 6582, 页码 760-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abn7760

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canada Excellence Research Chair Award
  2. VGH Foundation
  3. Genome BC, Canada
  4. Tai Hung Fai Charitable Foundation
  5. CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship Master's Award (CGS-M)
  6. CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships Doctoral Award (CGS D)
  7. University of British Columbia President's Academic Excellence Initiative PhD Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The newly reported Omicron variant shows new salt bridges and hydrogen bonds formed by mutated residues in the receptor binding domain, compensating for reduced ACE2 binding affinity. It also exhibits increased antibody evasion, which likely contributes to its rapid spread.
The newly reported Omicron variant is poised to replace Delta as the most prevalent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant across the world. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structural analysis of the Omicron variant spike protein in complex with human angioten-sinconverting enzyme 2 (ACE2) reveals new salt bridges and hydrogen bonds formed by mutated residues arginine-493, serine-496, and arginine-498 in the receptor binding domain with ACE2. These interactions appear to compensate for other Omicron mutations such as the substitution of asparagine for lysine at position 417 (K417N) that are known to reduce ACE2 binding affinity, resulting in similar biochemical ACE2 binding affinities for the Delta and Omicron variants. Neutralization assays show that pseudoviruses that display the Omicron spike protein exhibit increased antibody evasion. The increase in antibody evasion and the retention of strong interactions at the ACE2 interface thus represent important molecular features that likely contribute to the rapid spread of the Omicron variant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据