4.2 Article

Long-term pain relief after groin hernia repair for sports groin: A nationwide cohort study

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14574969211044030

关键词

Groin pain; sports groin; inguinal hernia surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nationwide cohort study found that most patients who underwent groin hernia repair for sports groin were pain-free and without physical impairment several years post-surgery, with high treatment satisfaction rate.
Background: The groin is a complex anatomical area with multiple structures that can be injured and cause pain. One condition with groin pain is the so-called sports groin, which can be treated with a groin hernia repair even though no hernia is present. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of chronic groin pain several years after a groin hernia repair performed in patients with a sports groin. Methods: This nationwide cohort study included adults who had a groin hernia repair for a sports groin through the years 1998-2011. The patients were identified through the Danish Hernia Database and in surgical records. Patients were asked to fill out four questionnaires several years after the repair: a visual analogue scale, the Activity Assessment Scale, the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire, and a questionnaire about treatment satisfaction. Results: Of 118 contacted patients, 71 gave informed consent and were included in the study (60%), and of these the response rate was 100%. The questionnaires were filled out median 14 years after surgery. Most of the patients were pain-free in the operated groin (87%), and only a few had physical impairment caused by groin pain (20%). Prior to surgery, 79% had groin pain that they could not ignore. Overall, 90% of the patients were satisfied with the treatment. Conclusions: Most patients were pain-free and without physical impairment several years after groin hernia repair for a sports groin and with high satisfaction rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据