4.2 Article

High CD4-to-CD8 ratio identifies an at-risk population susceptible to lethal COVID-19

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sji.13125

关键词

CD4-to-CD8 ratio; COVID-19; Intensive care unit; SARS-CoV-2; T cells; TEMRA

资金

  1. European Social Fund
  2. European Regional Development Fund-Project MAGNET [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000492]
  3. European Regional Development Fund-Project ENOCH [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868]
  4. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [NV18-06-00529, NU21J-05-00056]
  5. DRO (Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion - UHKT) [00023736]
  6. European Regional Development Fund - MSCA IF fellowships at FNUSA-ICRC [CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_074/0016274]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of blood immune cell subsets in severe COVID-19 patients revealed that a low CD4-to-CD8 T cell ratio upon admission was a strong predictor of in-ICU mortality, suggesting it could be used as an early marker for identifying patients who may need enhanced monitoring or proactive intervention in the ICU.
Around half of people with severe COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit (ICU) treatment will survive, but it is unclear how the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 differs between ICU patients that recover and those that do not. We conducted whole-blood immunophenotyping of COVID-19 patients upon admission to ICU and during their treatment and uncovered marked differences in their circulating immune cell subsets. At admission, patients who later succumbed to COVID-19 had significantly lower frequencies of all memory CD8+ T cell subsets, resulting in increased CD4-to-CD8 T cell and neutrophil-to-CD8 T cell ratios. ROC and Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that both CD4-to-CD8 and neutrophil-to-CD8 ratios at admission were strong predictors of in-ICU mortality. Therefore, we propose the use of the CD4-to-CD8 T cell ratio as a marker for the early identification of those individuals likely to require enhanced monitoring and/or pro-active intervention in ICU.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据