4.1 Article

The management of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

期刊

REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
卷 178, 期 1-2, 页码 64-73

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.11.006

关键词

Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Delayed cerebral ischemia; Vasospasm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a rare event with a high social impact on younger patients. The management of this condition involves addressing early brain injuries and preventing delayed cerebral ischemia, which is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. The understanding of the pathophysiology and strategies for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia is evolving.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a rare event affecting relatively young patients therefore leading to a high social impact. The management of SAH follows a biphasic course with early brain injuries in the first 72 hours followed by a phase at risk of secondary deterioration due to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in 20 to 30% patients. Cerebral infarction from DCI is the most preventable cause of mortality and morbidity after SAH. DCI prevention, early detection and treatment is therefore advocated. Formerly limited to the occurrence of vasospasm, DCI is now associated with multiple pathophysiological processes involving for instance the macrocirculation, the microcirculation, neurovascular units, and inflammation. Therefore, the therapeutic targets and management strategies are also evolving and are not only focused on proximal vasospasm. In this review, we describe the current knowledge of DCI pathophysiology. We then discuss the diagnosis strategies that may guide physicians at the bedside with a multimodal approach in the unconscious patient. We will present the prevention strategies that have proven efficient as well as future targets and present the therapeutic approach that is currently being developed when a DCI occurs. # 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据