4.6 Article

Interactions of two odorant-binding proteins influence insect chemoreception

期刊

INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 712-723

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imb.12256

关键词

odorant-binding protein; Cnaphalocrocis medinalis; molecular docking; fluorescence competitive binding assays; RNA interference; interactions; electroantennogram responses

资金

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China [201403030]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-01-17]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013PY046]
  4. China Scholarship Council of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that the odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) play crucial roles in insect olfactory detection. To explore if interactions of OBPs affect olfactory coding in the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis ligand-binding experiments, molecular docking, RNA interference and electrophysiological recording were performed. The binding activity of two C. medinalis OBPs (CmedOBPs) to rice plant volatiles showed wide flexibility depending on the structure of ligands and interactions of CmedOBPs involved. The binding sites of CmedOBP2 and CmedOBP3 to rice plant volatiles were well predicted by three-dimensional structure modelling and molecular docking experiments. In addition, the interactions of these two CmedOBPs in the perception of rice volatiles were demonstrated by RNA interference experiments. When a single double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-Cme-dOBP2 was injected, the expression of CmedOBP2 was significantly reduced and the expression of CmedOBP3 was significantly increased, and vice versa. When both dsRNA-CmedOBP2 and 3 were injected together, greater reduction of electroantennogram responses to rice plant volatiles was induced than that seen with individual injection of either dsRNA-CmedOBP2 or dsRNA-CmedOBP3. These results clearly indicate that the interactions of CmedOBP2 and CmedOBP3 have significant effects on C. medinalis during the detection of host plant volatiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据