4.5 Article

Classical vs. non-Archimedean analysis: an approach via algebraic genericity

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s13398-022-01209-5

关键词

p-adic numbers; p-adic continuous function; p-adic differentiable function; p-adic sequences; lineability; algebrability; spaceability; Cesaro summable; non-absolutely convergent series; Liouville's theorem; Lipschitz condition; Hahn-Banach theorem

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  2. European Social Fund through a Contrato Predoctoral para la Formacion de Doctores [PRE2019-089135]
  3. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [99019850]
  4. [PGC2018-097286-B-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the non-Archimedean counterpart of classical analysis in the theory of lineability is studied and new results and improvements are shown. The paper analyzes the algebraic genericity of sets of functions with properties regarding continuity, discontinuity, Lipschitzianity, differentiability, and analyticity, as well as the lineability of sets of sequences with properties concerning boundedness and convergence. The algebraic genericity of functions that do not satisfy Liouville's theorem, sequences that do not satisfy the classical theorem of Cesaro, and functionals that do not satisfy the classical Hahn-Banach theorem is also demonstrated.
In this paper, we show new results and improvements of the non-Archimedean counterpart of classical analysis in the theory of lineability. Besides analyzing the algebraic genericity of sets of functions having properties regarding continuity, discontinuity, Lipschitzianity, differentiability and analyticity, we also study the lineability of sets of sequences having properties concerning boundedness and convergence. In particular we show (among several other results) the algebraic genericity of: (i) functions that do not satisfy Liouville's theorem, (ii) sequences that do not satisfy the classical theorem of Cesaro, or (iii) functionals that do not satisfy the classical Hahn-Banach theorem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据