4.6 Article

A mode of action of glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates: Detoxification depletes glutathione and cysteine levels with ramifications on protein metabolism in Spodoptera littoralis

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.02.002

关键词

Glucosinolate; Isothiocyanate; Detoxification; Generalist herbivore; Protein metabolism; Sulforaphane; Glutathione

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. International Max Planck Research School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucosinolates are activated plant defenses common in the order Brassicales that release isothiocyanates (ITCs) and other hydrolysis products upon tissue damage. The reactive ITCs are toxic to insects resulting in reduced growth, delayed development and occasionally mortality. Generalist lepidopteran larvae often detoxify ingested ITCs via conjugation to glutathione (GSH) and survive on low glucosinolate diets, but it is not known how this process influences other aspects of metabolism. We investigated the impact of the aliphatic 4-methylsulfinylbutyl-ITC (4msob-ITC, sulforaphane) on the metabolism of Spodoptera littoralis larvae, which suffer a significant growth decline on 4msob-ITC-containing diets while excreting ITC-glutathione conjugates and their derivatives in the frass. The most striking effects were a decrease of GSH in midgut tissue and hemolymph due to losses by conjugation to ITC during detoxification, and a decline of the GSH biosynthetic precursor cysteine. Protein content was likewise reduced by ITC treatment suggesting that protein is actively catabolized in an attempt to supply cysteine for GSH biosynthesis. The negative growth and protein effects were relieved by dietary supplementation with cystine. Other consequences of protein breakdown included deamination of amino acids with increased excretion of uric acid and elevated lipid content. Thus metabolic detoxification of ITCs provokes a cascade of negative effects on insects that result in reduced fitness. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据