4.5 Article

Proton deflectometry with in situ x-ray reference for absolute measurement of electromagnetic fields in high-energy-density plasmas

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0064263

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-09CH11466, DE-NA0003868]
  3. U.S. DOE/NNSA by the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics [DE-NA0003856]
  4. [DE-NA0003960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a technique called proton deflectometry for precise measurements of magnetic fields in high-energy-density plasmas. This technique uses a grid and an in situ reference x-ray grid image to infer the line-integrated magnetic fields. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of this technique in measuring a nonuniform magnetic field and observing the interaction between an expanding plasma plume and the magnetic field.
We report a technique of proton deflectometry that uses a grid and an in situ reference x-ray grid image for precise measurements of magnetic fields in high-energy-density plasmas. A (DHe)-He-3 fusion implosion provides a bright point source of both protons and x-rays, which is split into beamlets by a grid. The protons undergo deflections as they propagate through the plasma region of interest, whereas the x-rays travel along straight lines. The x-ray image, therefore, provides a zero-deflection reference image. The line-integrated magnetic fields are inferred from the shifts of beamlets between the deflected (proton) and reference (x-ray) images. We developed a system for analysis of these data, including automatic algorithms to find beamlet locations and to calculate their deflections from the reference image. The technique is verified in an experiment performed at OMEGA to measure a nonuniform magnetic field in vacuum and then applied to observe the interaction of an expanding plasma plume with the magnetic field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据