4.3 Article

Diet and environment of Mylodon darwinii based on pollen of a Late-Glacial coprolite from the Mylodon Cave in southern Chile

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2021.104549

关键词

Chile; Coprolite; Diet; Giant ground sloth; Late-Glacial; Pollen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the pollen content of a Late-Glacial giant ground sloth coprolite from Mylodon Cave in southern Chile. The findings suggest that Mylodon may have been a selective feeder, as indicated by the presence of large amounts of Fragaria and Azorella pollen in its feces. Additionally, testing of ancient DNA in the sample showed low levels of ancient plant DNA preservation.
We studied the pollen content of a well-preserved coprolite of a Late-Glacial giant ground sloth (Mylodon darwinii) from the Mylodon Cave, province Ultima Esperanza, southern Chile. The specimen was obtained in 1909 and has been stored in a museum in the Netherlands since. It was radiocarbon dated to 13,140 +/- 55 BP (15,927-15,522 cal BP), which fits with other radiocarbon dates showing the early Late-Glacial presence of M. darwinii in the province Ultima Esperanza. Contemporaneous oxygen isotope data from Antarctic EPICA Dome C indicates that our Mylodon specimen lived during a warming phase of the Late-Glacial, ca. 1000 years before the start of the Antarctic Cold Reversal. We compared our pollen data with pollen records showing contemporaneous regional vegetation and discuss the uncertainties in the interpretation of pollen spectra fromfaeces. To expand on the pollen data, we tested ancient DNA preservation in the sample; we sequenced similar to 9.4 million DNA reads and found that the concentration of ancient plant DNA is below detectable levels. Pollen analysis confirms earlier findings that the Mylodon was a grazer, but the discovery of large amounts of Fragaria and Azorella pollen in the faeces may indicate that Mylodon was also able to select and consume specific plants, and therefore could also be regarded as a selective feeder. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据