4.4 Article

CHANGES IN SYSTEMIC LEVELS OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF AFLIBERCEPT OR BROLUCIZUMAB FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003344

关键词

aflibercept; age-related macular degeneration; brolucizumab; VEGF levels

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intravitreal brolucizumab leads to a sustained reduction in systemic VEGF-A levels, while aflibercept only provides short-term reduction. This may have implications for safety and long-term effects.
Purpose: To analyze and compare the effects of intravitreal brolucizumab versus aflibercept on systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: In this prospective interventional case series study, brolucizumab (6.0 mg/50 mu L) or aflibercept (2.0 mg/50 mu L) was injected intravitreally in 30 patients each. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 7 days and 28 days after the first injection. Systemic VEGF-A levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Thirty healthy individuals served as controls. Results: The median baseline systemic VEGF-A levels in the brolucizumab, aflibercept, and control groups were 10.8 (8.0-13.2), 12.0 (8.0-18.5), and 10.0 (8.0-15.1) pg/mL, respectively (P = 0.315). In the brolucizumab group, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased to 8.0 (8.0-11.5) pg/mL on Day 7 (P = 0.0254) and to 8.0 (8.0-8.0) pg/mL on Day 28 (P < 0.001). In the aflibercept group, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased to 8.0 (8.0-8.0) pg/mL on Day 7 (P < 0.001) but returned to the baseline level, 12.5 (8.5-14.6) pg/mL, on Day 28 (P = 0.120). Vascular endothelial growth factor-A levels were significantly different between the treatment groups after 28 days (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intravitreal brolucizumab resulted in a sustained reduction of systemic VEGF-A levels until 28 days posttreatment, which raises concerns regarding its safety and long-term effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据