4.2 Article

Menstrual phase does not influence ventilatory responses to group III/IV afferent signaling in eumenorrheic young females

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2021.103712

关键词

Estrogen; Ergoreflex; Metaboreflex; Ventilation; Exercise

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AG064038-01A1]
  2. University of Minnesota

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen was found to affect ventilation and tidal volume in females during lower-extremity exercise, but it does not impact the ventilatory responses to group III/IV afferent activation.
Estrogen can reduce sympathetic activity, but its effects on minute ventilation (VE) with group III/IV afferent activation remain unclear. This study examined the influence of estrogen on VE during lower-extremity exercise with group III/IV activation. Females completed two identical visits in follicular and ovulatory menstrual phases. Nine participants (age 25 +/- 4 years) performed three minutes of baseline steady-state cycle ergometry and then group III/IV afferents were further activated with proximal thigh cuffs inflated to 20, 60, and 100 mmHg (randomized) for two minutes and five minutes of cycling between each occlusion. Metaboreflex was isolated by post-exercise circulatory occlusion. Ventilation was measured continuously and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded for each stage. During rest and exercise, VE (p < 0.001) and tidal volume (VT) (p = 0.033) were higher in the follicular than ovulatory phase. Minute ventilation, VT, and respiratory rate (RR) with ergoreflex and metaboreflex activation were similar across phases. With cuff occlusion of 100 mmHg, VE increased from baseline by 26.3 +/- 7.0 L/min in the follicular phase (p < 0.001) and by 25.3 +/- 7.7 L/min in the ovulatory phase (p 0.001), with no difference between phases (p 0.05); RR and VT increased similarly with occlusion, also with no phase differences. In eumenorrheic females, menstrual phase influences ventilation but not ventilatory responses to group III/IV isolation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据