4.7 Article

Quantitative evaluation of spatial scale effects on regional water footprint in crop production

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105709

关键词

Spatial scale effects; Evapotranspiration; Wheat; Path analysis; green water; Blue water

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan [2018YFF0215702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809215]
  3. West Light Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that different spatial scales have significant impacts on the water footprint of crop production. Human management factors are the dominant drivers for large river basins, while meteorological factors play a key role at smaller spatial levels.
The water footprint of crop production (WFP) is among the most comprehensive agricultural water-consumption evaluation tools because it describes the amount, type, and location of water consumed. However, existing literatures on WFP quantification and evaluation are only aimed at a specific spatial level, and currently, there is a lack of quantitative research on the effects of different spatial levels on the variation in WFP. Herein, we calculated the spatial distribution of wheat WFPs in China from 2000 to 2014 at five different spatial levels: crop field, county, river sub-basin, provincial, and large river basin. In addition, we analysed and compared the key driving forces of wheat WFP at these spatial levels, focusing on meteorological and human management factors. Each spatial level had distinct spatial distributions. Human management factors demonstrated more significant effects on the WFP of large river basins, but the meteorological factors were the key drivers at smaller spatial levels. In conclusion, our study quantitatively revealed a non-negligible effect of spatial scale on WFP. Thus, for large river basins, agricultural water resource managers at each spatial level must clarify their different priorities across spatial levels while formulating water-saving and regulation measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据